@ember-blog wrote:
This is the 21st in our DecEmber series–"Countdown to The New Year: 31 Days of Ember Addons". We plan to highlight a new addon each day until the new year, and we hope you'll join us for the fun!
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://emberjs.com/blog/2019/12/21/countdown-to-the-new-year-ember-mapbox-gl.html
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@ember-blog wrote:
This is the 24th part of our DecEmber series–"Countdown to The New Year: 31 Days of Ember Addons". Highlighting a new addon each day until the new year starts, we hope you enjoy learning together with us!
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://emberjs.com/blog/2019/12/24/countdown-to-the-new-year-ember-cli-typescript.html
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@SarathSantoshDamaraj wrote:
#1
I am using a plugin Dayjs, and want to be available like MomentJs in window scope –
window.moment. I am manually adding it to window from a utils file.//.../utils/dayjs.js import dayjs from 'dayjs' ... window.dayjs = dayjs; ...Is there any better way to do the same from ember perspective ?
#2
and I also at some point in one of
component.jsfiles, appending script tag to thedocument.head. Considering the script content is from the same domain and secure.//.../someComponent/component.js ... appendScript() { var script = document.createElement('script'); script.type = 'text/javascript'; script.text = locale.content; script.text += `dayjs.locale('${locale}')`; document.head.appendChild(script); }Is there any other approach to accomplish this too ?
-TIA
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@ember-blog wrote:
This is the 25th in our December series–"Countdown to The New Year: 31 Days of Ember Addons". We plan to highlight a new addon each day until the new year, and we hope you'll join us for the fun!
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://emberjs.com/blog/2019/12/25/countdown-to-the-new-year-ember-template-invocation-location.html
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@danchann wrote:
Ember version: 3.10.2
After I changed the relation to belongsTo I get a proxy object. I have tried many different syntaxes to access it without success.
I originally had a model firstName: DS.attr(“string”), lastName: DS.attr(“string”), group: DS.attr()
then I changed group to
group: DS.belongsTo("group-names")in model/group-names I have
name: DS.attr("string")The reason that I made the change was that I’m trying to track the dirtyAttribute of the model with nested properties. This question was seen to come up a few times over the years.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@ember-blog wrote:
This is the 26th in our December series–"Countdown to The New Year: 31 Days of Ember Addons". We plan to highlight a new addon each day until the new year, and we hope you'll join us for the fun!
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://emberjs.com/blog/2019/12/26/countdown-to-the-new-year-ember-cli-update.html
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@J_A_L wrote:
I used notifyPropertyChanged in a few Ember Objects. In the classes I have a property getter that makes an external third party API call and sometimes I want to at-will update that data. It works perfectly, but with the change to native classes it seems like EmberObject is sort of going to be eventually deprecated. Am I reading too much into this? Is there a more preferred design pattern.
For a real world example, suppose I display the outside temperature. There’s a button the user clicks to update the outside temperature. There’s no ready way to get the third party temperature service to set the value on the object. So, if I get the temperature from the third party API, and use notifyPropertyChanged on that property any templates etc that use that property rerender. The only other way I’ve seen it done is to wrap the rendered property in an if and then toggle the if conditional which seems really clunky.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@wukongrita wrote:
Hi, I have:
[ { id: // the field to be search { eq: '1234' // eq is the operand; 1234 is the keyword } }, { description: { like: 'desc' } } ]How to transform it to query parameters to:
?filter[id][eq]=1234&filter[description][like]=descsince the API needed the format like so for the filters?
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@Henry wrote:
I’m developing an ember application that uses synchronized and versioned data from clients. To prevent clients to update instantly their data version every time a new release of the app is made, we decided to support a window of versions (let’s say the current app version and the previous two). We want to handle this version control automatically, so the user will only see that new features have been added when the data version has been updated; otherwise, they keep seeing the same app that they have been using before. To achieve this, we thought of separating the authentication process into a different application so, when a user logs in
app.com, he or she is redirected toapp.com/vX/dashboard, where vX is the version supported for that user’s data.This approach works and makes easy the deployment process because when a new app version is released, we only need to add a new vX path for the deployed files and this keeps the previous versions still available on their own paths. But having the Auth process separate into a different app makes development and testing harder. The app makes also a heavy use of service workers so this can be challenging to handle when the users change from one version to another.
What’s your opinion about this? Is there a better way to handle this scenario? Am I missing unforeseen consequences of this that will make this solution a terrible choice? I will welcome any feedback you can provide me.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@ember-blog wrote:
This is the 27th in our DecEmber series–"Countdown to The New Year: 31 Days of Ember Addons". We plan to highlight a new addon each day until the new year, and we hope you'll join us for the fun!
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://emberjs.com/blog/2019/12/27/countdown-to-the-new-year-ember-in-viewport.html
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@ember-blog wrote:
This is the 28th in our DecEmber series–"Countdown to The New Year: 31 Days of Ember Addons". We plan to highlight a new addon each day until the new year, and we hope you'll join us for the fun!
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://emberjs.com/blog/2019/12/28/countdown-to-the-new-year-ember-changeset.html
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@harimath wrote:
I am trying to grasp a basic understanding of Ember’s module system.
So specifically have 2 questions;
Does it use the CommonJS module system OR the native ES2015 module system?
Have there been any changes in that implementation over the course of different Ember versions. I saw this article on Module Unification https://blog.emberjs.com/2019/03/11/update-on-module-unification-and-octane.html What specifically is getting updated with this ?
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@ember-blog wrote:
This is the twenty-ninth in our DecEmber series–"Countdown to The New Year: 31 Days of Ember Addons". We plan to highlight a new addon each day until the new year, and we hope you'll join us for the fun!
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://emberjs.com/blog/2019/12/29/countdown-to-the-new-year-ember-code-snippet.html
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@Yassine wrote:
ember-cli-update command is failing with this error: any ideas!
{ Error: Command failed: git clone --mirror https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-new-output /var/folders/zr/gt42wmv51g7ffz7n0dx9wfzc0000gp/T/tmp-24473KUOfMNXroFSq/.git Cloning into bare repository '/var/folders/zr/gt42wmv51g7ffz7n0dx9wfzc0000gp/T/tmp-24473KUOfMNXroFSq/.git'... Bad owner or permissions on /Users/yassiney./.ssh/config fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:294:12) at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:198:13) at maybeClose (internal/child_process.js:982:16) at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (internal/child_process.js:259:5) killed: false, code: 128, signal: null, cmd: 'git clone --mirror https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-new-output /var/folders/zr/gt42wmv51g7ffz7n0dx9wfzc0000gp/T/tmp-24473KUOfMNXroFSq/.git', stdout: '', stderr: 'Cloning into bare repository \'/var/folders/zr/gt42wmv51g7ffz7n0dx9wfzc0000gp/T/tmp-24473KUOfMNXroFSq/.git\'...\nBad owner or permissions on /Users/yassiney./.ssh/config\r\nfatal: Could not read from remote repository.\n\nPlease make sure you have the correct access rights\nand the repository exists.\n' }
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@ember-blog wrote:
This is already the second to last edition of our December series-"Countdown to The New Year: 31 Days of Ember Addons". In this series we are highlighting a new addon each day until the new year, and we hope you'll join us for the fun!
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://emberjs.com/blog/2019/12/30/countdown-to-the-new-year-ember-exam.html
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@Yassine wrote:
One one has an idea what this error is for?! I tried everything but couldn’t figure it out (it occurred while trying to compile my app after upgrading it, I’m using the <Button element from the ember-elements library)
Uncaught (in promise) Error: Compile Error: Cannot find component button at opcode-compiler.js:152 at Compilers.compile (opcode-compiler.js:44) at compile (opcode-compiler.js:740) at LazyCompiler.add (opcode-compiler.js:934) at CompilableProgram.compile (opcode-compiler.js:698) at OutletComponentManager.getLayout (index.js:4403) at Object.evaluate (runtime.js:1689) at AppendOpcodes.evaluate (runtime.js:73) at LowLevelVM.evaluateSyscall (runtime.js:3295) at LowLevelVM.evaluateInner (runtime.js:3241) (anonymous) @ opcode-compiler.js:152 compile @ opcode-compiler.js:44 compile @ opcode-compiler.js:740 add @ opcode-compiler.js:934 compile @ opcode-compiler.js:698 getLayout @ index.js:4403 (anonymous) @ runtime.js:1689 evaluate @ runtime.js:73 evaluateSyscall @ runtime.js:3295 evaluateInner @ runtime.js:3241 evaluateOuter @ runtime.js:3233 next @ runtime.js:5299 next @ runtime.js:5335 RootState.render @ index.js:5550 runInAutotrackingTransaction @ index.js:1039 _renderRoots @ index.js:5848 _renderRootsTransaction @ index.js:5886 _renderRoot @ index.js:5806 _appendDefinition @ index.js:5721 appendOutletView @ index.js:5707 invoke @ backburner.js:340 flush @ backburner.js:229 flush @ backburner.js:426 _end @ backburner.js:960 Backburner._boundAutorunEnd @ backburner.js:629 Promise.then (async) iterations @ backburner.js:28 flush @ index.js:53 _scheduleAutorun @ backburner.js:1179 _end @ backburner.js:970 Backburner._boundAutorunEnd @ backburner.js:629 Promise.then (async) iterations @ backburner.js:28 flush @ index.js:53 _scheduleAutorun @ backburner.js:1179 _end @ backburner.js:970 Backburner._boundAutorunEnd @ backburner.js:629 Promise.then (async) iterations @ backburner.js:28 flush @ index.js:53 _scheduleAutorun @ backburner.js:1179 _end @ backburner.js:970 Backburner._boundAutorunEnd @ backburner.js:629 Promise.then (async) iterations @ backburner.js:28 flush @ index.js:53 _scheduleAutorun @ backburner.js:1179 _end @ backburner.js:970 Backburner._boundAutorunEnd @ backburner.js:629 Promise.then (async) iterations @ backburner.js:28 flush @ index.js:53 _scheduleAutorun @ backburner.js:1179 _ensureInstance @ backburner.js:1167 schedule @ backburner.js:776 schedule @ index.js:372 waitForDOMReady @ application.js:442 init @ application.js:354 superWrapper @ index.js:423 initialize @ core_object.js:90 create @ core_object.js:681 (anonymous) @ app-boot.js:3
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@bmurphy wrote:
Hi all,
I’m trying to get some basic Integration tests going for some of my components. Looking at the docs and other examples it would seem that generally you want to not make things too complicated for yourself and assert against the rendered text content, for example. That’s all fine for basic small examples but my component renders an entire table of content. Looking at the string output it would appear my tests would get kinda messy. What do others do when doing component content rendering tests?
Thanks!
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@ember-blog wrote:
This is the last of our December series-"Countdown to The New Year: 31 Days of Ember Addons". Thank you for joining us!
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://emberjs.com/blog/2019/12/31/countdown-to-the-new-year.html
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@bumbu wrote:
I’m trying to use EmberObject and computed like in this tutorial in a non-ember project.
I installed (via NPM) ember-source, but trying to import ‘ember-source/dist/packages/@ember/object’ has issues as it can’t find other dependent modules (e.g. ‘@ember/-internals/metal’).
I’m using typescript (latest) and webpack (v3).
Is there a way to use EmberObject outside of ember setup?
Posts: 1
Participants: 1